Essay Corrections available at http://www.ieltswritingtask.net/ https://www.facebook.com/IeltsWritingTask-205577652822039/ https://www.youtube.com/c/ieltsessaycorrection Communication is less between family members of late. Do you agree or disagree?
To what extent do you agree?
Although numerous advancements in technology have facilitated communication, many people believe that family communication has decreased. I strongly disagree with this statement and think that communication between families has improved recently.
Firstly, prohibitive prices of mobile and fixed telecommunication are decreasing, making it less expensive to stay in touch for family members than in the past. This is largely because with the introduction of new technologies and increasing competition, prices are falling, thus allowing people to spend more time on the phone when they are not in the same physical location. Take for example commuters, while people are moving from one place to another, they can talk on the phone with family members without incurring expensive bills. Therefore, decreasing costs in the telecommunication sector has increased the number of hours communicating with the family.
Secondly, thanks to the evolution of the internet, migrants are able to communicate more with family back home. This is due to the fact that internet access speeds have been increasing exponentially in the last decade, permitting high quality voice and video communications over the internet to applications, such as Skype and Whatsapp. A recent Skype study suggested that family members scattered in different countries are using the application more than ever. For this reason, although people are moving around the world, they are able to stay in touch with loved ones.
To conclude, factors such as decreasing costs in telecommunication and advancements in technology has provided an aid for families to communicate. In my opinion, more platforms will be created in the future, allowing more ways to communicate between family members.
Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and imagination than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
It is commonly believed that to stimulate children’s skills and development doing fun activities is more effective than reading books. I agree with this statement and I think that youngsters can develop more skills while performing enjoyable activities than while reading.
Firstly, playing sports is an activity that most kids enjoy and can have positive implications in children development. This is because, when kids play sports – especially in team – they need to exchange ideas with teammates to have optimum results, as a consequence their social skills improve. For example, Harvard University research discovered that people who played football when they were children were better at working in teams. Therefore, the link between playing sports and positive implications later in life at the workplace is demonstrated.
Secondly, kid’s museum visits can be educational and at the same time very enjoyable. This is due to the fact that thes kind of museums are made to increase interest in natural phenomena around children, as a result immagination is boosted. A survey conducted in 20 highly recognized universities in Europe showed that 70% of researchers went regularly to children’s museums when they were kids. For researchers, creativity and imagination are key areas to stimulate in order to solve complex problems – this can be achieved at an early age by taking youngsters in school age to museums.
To conclude, the advantages of doing enjoyable activities outweigh those of reading. For instance, some activities such as football and guided visits to museums have proven to be of high value for children development.
The post ESSAY-JACOB-GREAT-START appeared first on IELTS ESSAY CORRECTION.
No comments:
Post a Comment